Drones might quickly be used as first responders in vacationer areas and in bigger districts the place officers are stretched too skinny, stated Anne Kirkpatrick, Superintendent of the New Orleans Police Division, who floated the concept final week on WWL Radio.
“One of many issues we now have been is utilizing expertise—particularly drones—as a primary responder. We’re gonna be doing it as a pilot right here within the Eighth District, which is the French Quarter and our CBD. However take into consideration the Seventh District, all of that East New Orleans, an enormous mass of land,” Kirkpatrick informed WWL. “We don’t have sufficient officers we are able to employees on the market.”
The idea could be a primary for town, however not for the nation nor even for the metro space. In December, Jefferson Parish introduced that it will be utilizing drones to reply to emergency calls, in a transfer that JPSO described as “the way forward for public security.”
On Monday, the French Quarter Administration District’s safety and enforcement committee took step one towards drone response in New Orleans, because it voted to finance one $250,000 NOPD drone and docking station—the place the place the drone parks and deploys from. The NOPD had initially requested the acquisition of three to 4 drones, however the committee solely authorized one.
The drone mission will subsequent be thought of by the FQMD’s finance committee, earlier than going to a full board vote.
In 2018, town of Chula Vista, California and its police division, the CVPD, turned the first metropolis within the nation to institute a “drone as first responder,” or “DFR” program.
In concept, a DFR program permits police to launch a drone or fleet of drones to an space with a view to give officers “situational consciousness” – permitting them a primary look on the scene, the power to watch folks of curiosity, and an opportunity to grasp the state of affairs higher earlier than deploying boots-on-the-ground officers.
One actor within the trade calls it a “pressure multiplier.”
Response time by drone could possibly be ‘beneath a minute’ in New Orleans
NOPD drones would give you the option “to establish if an officer is even wanted,” stated former NOPD superintendent Michael Harrison, who’s now deputy mayor of public security for town. Although the NOPD didn’t reply to questions from The Lens by press time, Harrison talked concerning the drones in an interview with JD Carrere posted on Monday on his Twitter and Instagram accounts, @JDfromthe504.
Drones would additionally pace response instances, Harrison stated, responding to many locations on town “in beneath a minute,” way more quickly than an officer coming by automobile.
The commonest drone-response state of affairs is a minor automobile crash, a fender-bender, Harrison informed Carrere, or a non-emergency nuisance name, or a medical state of affairs the place somebody might have an ambulance, not a police officer. In these circumstances, the drones would permit NOPD officers to give attention to different issues that require on-scene officers, he stated.
Dennis Gakunga, who helped launch Chula Vista’s use of drones as first responders, is now working for the Metropolis of New Orleans as its Deputy Chief Info Officer, based on his LinkedIn.
Chula Vista and different departments have since grappled with privateness issues attributable to this system.
Chula Vista’s program was the primary city police pressure within the nation to obtain permission from the Federal Aviation Administration to “fly past bodily sight strains” based on Mobile Telecommunications Trade Affiliation, a commerce group that represents the American wi-fi communications trade.
Many metropolis police departments now use drones
Dozens of cities now use a DFR program, based on the Washington Publish. The variety of departments implementing this system has skyrocketed because the FAA streamlined the method in 2025, based on the Publish, which famous that approval instances had dropped from as much as a 12 months to a matter of days.
Behind the advantages are privateness issues about how a lot the drone cameras observe to, from, and in the course of the emergency name, inside non-public and constitutionally protected areas, as one 2024 report described it. Considerations go far past cameras, the report from Digital Frontier Basis (EFF) stated, since“drones may be outfitted with cameras, thermal imaging, microphones, license plate readers, face recognition, mapping expertise, cell-site simulators, weapons, and different payloads.”
“Proliferation of those gadgets,” the EFF report concluded, “permits state surveillance even for routine operations and in response to innocuous calls—conditions unrelated to the unique issues of terrorism or violent crime initially used to justify their adoption.”
The DFR program may additionally be used as an excuse so as to add extra police consideration, via drone remark, to already over-policed and racially profiled communities, based on the report. Some 1,500 police departments use drones in some capability, based on the report.
Opening the door to much more widespread surveillance?
“‘Drones as first responder’ is mass surveillance with a sympathetic identify,” stated Matthew Wollenweber, a New Orleans-based safety researcher.
“Cameras don’t cease crime. Cameras don’t present first help. Drones are digicam methods,” Wollenweber stated. “As a substitute of a police officer responding to a 911 name, he’s sitting at a police station piloting a drone to uselessly watch crime on a pc monitor. New Orleans doesn’t want extra mass surveillance, and NOPD can’t be trusted with extra spy cameras.”
The introduction of drones as first responders raises questions on different applied sciences that Gakunga introduced into frequent use in Chula Vista. “It’s not only for drones. We now have automated license plate readers, visitors cameras, and we acquire info. There’s numerous info we acquire from residents,” Gakunga stated when he was Chief Sustainability Officer for Chula Vista.
However in current months, there’s been a backlash throughout the nation to a few of that now-common tech. Cities have been yanking their contracts with Flock, an organization that runs a community of license-plate readers, which allowed out-of-state regulation enforcement to entry municipal-resident knowledge, some for immigration functions.
One main concern is how synthetic intelligence (AI) might be built-in into DFR packages, stated Jay Stanley, a senior coverage analyst with the ACLU’s Speech, Privateness, and Know-how Undertaking.
“AI can search via huge oceans of video knowledge for very particular issues – it makes it a way more highly effective surveillance system,” Stanley stated.
“So, if cameras are ‘on’ whereas drones are flying round a metropolis en path to a name, they could possibly be storing up an enormous quantity of video for random different issues. It could possibly be abused by particular person officers, it could possibly be abused by complete departments: monitoring folks for political causes, as an alternative of as a result of they’re suspected of against the law – one thing we’ve seen all through American historical past,” Stanley stated.
NOPD drones will ‘acquire intelligence’
NOPD drones won’t be “combing via folks’s info to scan faces,” Harrison asserted. However they’ll acquire intelligence on the scenes, he stated. “If individuals are capturing at one another, there’s info that could possibly be identified.”
For now, drones are typically operated by human beings. However that will not at all times be the case. And that raises critical questions, Stanley stated.
“There’s a transfer within the drone world to maneuver in direction of autonomous flights that navigate themselves,” he stated, “and make choices about the place they fly and likewise doubtlessly choices about the place they focus their cameras.”
For Wollenweber, the answer to issues round surveillance in New Orleans can primarily be resolved at a neighborhood stage.
“The Metropolis Council must move laws with enamel to ensure any surveillance expertise is just not abused,” he stated.



