Studying Time: 4 minutes

Megyn Kelly picked a bizarre time to separate hairs about Jeffrey Epstein and pedophilia.

This week, the world first noticed Epstein’s emails about Donald Trump. They’re unflattering, describing Trump spending time with victims and conserving quiet.

To be blunt, it’s clear that rather more is poised to come back out. Political commentators count on damning images of Trump within the combine.

In what seems to be an effort to pave the best way politically, Kelly actually needs to speak about how Epstein wasn’t a “pedophile” however reasonably into “barely authorized” 15-year-olds. (Oh no!)

Megyn Kelly says that Jeffrey Epstein was in all probability not a pedophile, most popular ‘barely authorized’ 15-year-old women

With only a handful of Republican defectors pushing for the discharge of Epstein paperwork over the objections of Donald Trump and his loyalists, Megyn Kelly seems to be doing harm management.

In the course of the Wednesday, November 12 episode of her podcast, Kelly claimed that she is aware of “any person very, very near this case who is able to know nearly every part. Not every part, however nearly every part.”

Kelly continued: “And this particular person has advised me from the beginning years and years in the past that Jeffrey Epstein, on this particular person’s view, was not a pedophile.”

As you could have guessed, she’s drawing the road between youngsters who haven’t but began puberty and kids who’ve began puberty.

“He was into the hardly authorized sort. Like, he appreciated 15-year-old women,” Kelly described. There’s nothing barely authorized a few grown man preying upon 15-year-olds. It’s a crime! Not barely authorized, however absolutely unlawful.

Megyn Kelly: “I do know any person very near this case…Jeffrey Epstein, on this particular person’s view, was not a pedophile…He was into the hardly authorized sort, like he appreciated 15 12 months outdated women…He wasn’t into like 8 12 months olds…There is a distinction between a 15 12 months outdated and a 5 12 months outdated.” pic.twitter.com/a7wmT3BRJU

— Republican Accountability (@AccountableGOP) November 13, 2025

“And I understand that is disgusting,” Kelly admitted. She claimed: “I’m positively not attempting to make an excuse for this.”

Nonetheless, she continued, noting that Epstein”wasn’t into, like, 8-year-olds.”

(There are sometimes authorized distinctions between the sexual abuse of kids beneath sure age thresholds, nevertheless it stays a criminal offense nonetheless)

“However he appreciated the very younger teen varieties that would go for even youthful than they have been,” Kelly described, “however would look authorized to a passerby.”

Kelly famous that Pam Bondi has claimed that authorities discovered CSAM on Epstein’s units, saying “they used to name it kiddie porn, now they name it youngster sexual abuse materials” and including: “I don’t actually belief Pam Bondi’s phrase on the Epstein issues anymore.”

‘There’s a distinction between a 15-year-old and a 5-year-old’

“Yeah, so I don’t know what’s true about him,” Megyn Kelly mentioned of late intercourse trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.

“However we’ve got but to see anyone come ahead and say I used to be below 10, I used to be below 14 after I first got here inside his purview,” she added.

For the report, Epstein’s youngest recognized sufferer was 14 years outdated. That might be as younger as an eighth grader.

“You may say that’s a distinction and not using a distinction. I feel there’s a distinction,” Kelly insisted. “There’s a distinction between a 15-year-old and a 5-year-old, you recognize?”

There’s a distinction, positive. However, after we are speaking about decades-older grownup males — not, say, barely older teenagers — does the excellence matter? What, one wonders, is the purpose of quibbling over phrases, right here?

In equity, in relation to the details of what a pedophile is and isn’t, Kelly is right.

A pedophile is somebody with sexual curiosity in a prepubescent youngster. A hebephile has an curiosity in additional tween-aged victims. And an ephebophile is extra all in favour of teenagers (a few of whom could also be authorized adults, others not).

There’s a purpose that we don’t actually toss round these different two labels. As a result of, like somebody being somewhat too conversant in age of consent legal guidelines from state to state and nation to nation, it doesn’t sound like a enjoyable truth.

It sounds such as you’re being overly technical and splitting hairs since you’re a creep. Typically, when drawing a distinction seems like defending an evil man, you simply must focus much less upon being technically correct.

Comic Gianmarco Soresi has a stand-up about this. He has even repurposed it extra just lately to focus on Epstein and Trump this very week.

Proper now, Trump loyalists are circling the wagons and bracing for the reality to come back out

These types of distinctions come up in different contexts. For instance, folks will say “assassin” about somebody who might have dedicated manslaughter.

(On this space, being technically right might enable you keep away from a lawsuit — whereas “your honor, I’m merely a hebephile and this particular person is defaming me” is unlikely to get you far in court docket)

The actual query right here is why Megyn Kelly is selecting to mince phrases so rigorously about Jeffrey Epstein at this explicit time.

We don’t declare to know the previous Fox host, former NBC host, present podcaster’s inner-most ideas.

Nevertheless, right now, the discharge of extraordinarily damning materials connecting Donald Trump to younger teenage women — just like the “barely authorized” 15-year-olds to whom Kelly referred — seems imminent.

The place others within the MAGA cult are wanting past Trump, others like Mike Johnson and Megyn Kelly seem determined to do harm management. If that isn’t their aim, one has to marvel simply what’s.