Louisianians are set to vote Saturday on a number of constitutional amendments coping with crime, courts and funds.
Throughout a particular legislative session centered on Gov. Jeff Landry’s tax reform overhaul final fall, lawmakers accredited 4 proposed modifications to the state’s structure.
Right here’s an summary of the primary points going earlier than voters:
Making it simpler to cost minors as adults
Final yr, Louisiana’s GOP-dominated Legislature voted to deal with 17-year-olds as adults within the felony justice system, as a part of Landry’s broad tough-on-crime agenda.
Prosecutors may also cost anybody underneath 17 as an grownup for offenses together with rape, homicide and armed theft, in line with an inventory within the state’s structure. Adjustments to this record require a statewide vote.
Voters are being requested to take away the record from the structure so lawmakers can extra simply increase the sorts of crimes that may result in juveniles being charged as adults.
Supporters say this offers lawmakers with extra flexibility to reply to the desires of prosecutors. Opponents say this can be a draconian strategy that doesn’t handle the systemic causes of youth crime.
Liquidate training belief funds to assist everlasting instructor pay increase
The biggest and most intricate proposed modification exceeds 100 pages and considerations the notoriously convoluted income and finance part of the Louisiana Structure. The sweeping modifications are condensed for voters as a poll query that’s lower than 100 phrases.
One of many key modifications proposed within the modification is to liquidate a number of training belief funds to repay round $2 billion in public faculty system debt. They’d then use the financial savings on curiosity funds to the funds to spice up instructor salaries by $2,000 a yr.
The modification would additionally tighten restrictions on growing state spending for ongoing packages and merge two state financial savings accounts that will give lawmakers more cash to spend however doubtlessly cut back long-term wet day funds.
Whereas the proposed modifications acquired bipartisan assist from lawmakers who say it could streamline authorities effectivity and enhance fiscal planning, critics have argued the modifications lack transparency and destabilize financial savings and training funds.
Adjustments to the court docket system
Louisiana’s Legislature is asking voters to provide them broader energy to determine specialty courts. The state already has dozens of specialty courts dealing with circumstances on points together with veteran’s affairs and drug abuse, however they’re certain to particular parishes and judicial districts.
Beneath the proposed constitutional change, lawmakers would have the power to create statewide or regional courts. Supporters say this might enable for extra latitude to deal with advanced circumstances similar to enterprise litigations, whereas critics have mentioned this may very well be a means for conservative lawmakers to undermine the facility of judges in additional liberal New Orleans.
One other modification would give the state extra flexibility in filling judicial vacancies on its Supreme Court docket. As a substitute of being mandated to fill a gap inside 12 months because the structure stipulates — doubtlessly requiring a pricey particular election — these judicial elections can be a part of the subsequent scheduled common election. The potential challenge emerged after Louisiana lawmakers voted final yr to finish the custom of “jungle” primaries for the state’s Supreme Court docket.
___
Brook is a corps member for The Related Press/Report for America Statehouse Information Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit nationwide service program that locations journalists in native newsrooms to report on undercovered points. Observe Brook on the social platform X: @jack_brook96.