KEY TAKEAWAYS:
- Fifth Circuit affirms songwriters can reclaim worldwide copyright possession
- Ruling upholds Cyril Vetter’s rights to 1963 hit “Double Shot”
- Determination expands scope of U.S. copyright termination rights
- Music business contracts and licensing practices could possibly be reshaped
A federal appeals court docket ruling may reshape music publishing contracts and strengthen long-term protections for songwriters, after judges affirmed that U.S. copyright legislation permits creators to reclaim world possession of their work.
The U.S. Courtroom of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit dominated Monday that songwriter Cyril Vetter holds worldwide copyright possession of the 1963 hit “Double Shot (Of My Child’s Love),” rejecting arguments that his rights had been restricted to america. The choice upheld a January 2025 ruling by the U.S. District Courtroom for the Center District of Louisiana in Vetter v. Resnik.
The case was argued by Tim Kappel, an assistant professor of music business research at Loyola College New Orleans and affiliate director of the college’s Faculty of Music and Theatre Professions. Kappel represented Vetter by way of Vetter Communications Corp. and has lengthy advocated for expanded songwriter protections.
The ruling facilities on “termination rights,” a provision in U.S. copyright legislation that enables authors to reclaim possession of their work after a specified interval, even when these rights had been beforehand transferred to publishers. The Fifth Circuit agreed with the decrease court docket that these rights prolong globally, not simply domestically.
“We knew from the beginning that we had the legislation on our facet, although we felt it had been misapplied for many years,” Kappel stated. “Now, songwriters will be capable to recapture the total scope of what they gave away, which is what we expect Congress supposed to occur. They get again precisely what they gave away, and nothing much less.”
Vetter co-wrote “Double Shot (Of My Child’s Love)” with Don Smith in Baton Rouge within the early Sixties. The tune later turned a nationwide hit after being recorded by The Swingin’ Medallions, charting on Billboard and turning into a staple of traditional rock radio.
Like many songwriters of the period, Vetter and Smith signed early publishing agreements that transferred possession to Windsong Music Publishers Inc. for $1. A long time later, Vetter exercised his termination rights beneath federal legislation after buying Smith’s curiosity from his heirs. A dispute emerged in 2022 when American Broadcasting Firms Inc. sought to license the tune for worldwide use and Resnik Music Group claimed it retained partial possession outdoors america.
That dispute prompted Vetter to file go well with, arguing that termination restored full world possession. Chief U.S. District Decide Shelly Dick agreed, ruling that the statute doesn’t impose geographic limits on termination rights. The Fifth Circuit affirmed that interpretation.
The case drew nationwide consideration from the leisure and publishing industries. Amicus briefs supporting Vetter had been filed by organizations together with the Authors Guild, the Songwriters Guild of America and SAG-AFTRA, which argued that limiting termination rights would undermine the legislation’s goal and weaken protections for creators.
Sheryl Kennedy Haydel, dean of Loyola’s Faculty of Music and Media, stated the ruling highlights the college’s function in shaping nationwide coverage.
“Our college students have the uncommon alternative to be taught from a professor whose work is shaping copyright legislation on the highest degree,” Haydel stated. “Tim Kappel’s success on this landmark case exemplifies the caliber of school and schooling at Loyola.”
Trade analysts say the choice may immediate publishers to reevaluate long-standing catalog agreements and licensing methods, notably for legacy works with worldwide income streams. For songwriters, the ruling reinforces management over how their work is used — and the way revenues are distributed — many years after preliminary contracts had been signed.
“It’s about sustaining management of the work,” Kappel stated. “Because the proprietor of the copyright, you get to resolve how the work is used, or not used, and also you get to retain 100% of the income.”



