US Entertainment

The Federal Antitrust Lawsuit Highlights The Cozy Relationship Between Dwell Nation And Oak View Group







LOS ANGELES (CelebrityAccess) — The federal antitrust lawsuit towards Dwell Nation underscores the corporate’s shut relationship with Oak View Group (OVG), the venue administration and advisory firm launched by former Dwell Nation chairman Irving Azoff and Tim Leiweke, the previous President and CEO of Anschutz Leisure Group, Dwell Nation’s main U.S. rival.

When Oak View Group launched in 2015, it appeared poised to develop into a significant competitor to Dwell Nation by reserving prime artists for its managed arenas and different main live performance venues throughout the U.S., difficult Dwell Nation’s dominance in main excursions. The launch of OVG led Dwell Nation to explain the corporate as certainly one of its “Largest Competitor Threats” shortly after OVG’s inception, in keeping with the federal lawsuit.

Nonetheless, that potential rivalry didn’t materialize, and in keeping with the Division of Justice (DOJ), this was not a coincidence.

The DOJ alleges that emails between senior executives of each corporations reveal an in depth and coordinated relationship. OVG executives described the corporate as a “pimp” and “hammer” for Dwell Nation, serving to to carry venues into the Dwell Nation/Ticketmaster fold.

“I all the time defend you on rebates, promoter place, ticketing,” Tim Leiweke instructed Dwell Nation CEO Michael Rapino in a single communication cited by the DOJ lawsuit.

Moreover, the federal lawsuit alleges that Oak View Group successfully ceded the live performance promotion enterprise to Dwell Nation, whereas the promoter big backed away from the world house to keep away from encroaching on OVG’s enterprise.

“It has been our coverage to remain on the sidelines in the case of shopping for and particularly selling tour dates as we’re cognizant to not compete with our accomplice Dwell Nation on this facet of the enterprise,” an Oak View Group Senior Vice President instructed a colleague by way of electronic mail, in keeping with the federal government’s lawsuit.

The DOJ cites a 2016 incident by which the 2 corporations labored to keep away from competitors in negotiations with artist representatives over a possible tour.

“What’s up? Now we have achieved his [touring] and Vegas[.] Let’s be sure that we don’t let [the artist agency] begin enjoying us off,” Rapino purportedly instructed Oak View Group, with OVG’s Tim Leiweke responding, “Our guys acquired a bit forward. All know we don’t promote and we solely do excursions with Dwell Nation.”

One other incident cited by the DOJ in 2022 adopted an analogous theme.

“Who can be so silly to do that and play into [the artist agent’s] arms?” Rapino reportedly wrote in an electronic mail to colleagues at Oak View Group. OVG CEO Tim Leiweke, responded, stating, “Now we have by no means promoted with out you. Gained’t,” and later added, “More than pleased to do these offers by LN as I’ve all the time been aligned,” and “I by no means wish to be opponents,” in subsequent emails, in keeping with the DOJ.

The DOJ’s swimsuit additionally claims that Oak View Group helps steer venues to Dwell Nation’s Ticketmaster platform. In accordance with the swimsuit, OVG projected that it will transition a minimum of 22 venues to Ticketmaster over the following 4 years.

Oak View Group has not been accused of wrongdoing and isn’t a celebration to the lawsuit.

In response to the federal antitrust lawsuit, Dwell Nation’s Dan Wall, Government Vice President of Company and Regulatory Affairs, addressed the corporate’s relationship with Oak View Group in a prolonged assertion launched on Thursday.

“The grievance makes two principal claims regarding Dwell Nation’s relationship with the Oak View Group (OVG), a venue administration firm. The primary is disingenuous, as it’s premised on the concept that OVG was a critical potential rival to Dwell Nation in live performance promotion. OVG owns and manages venues. It has by no means been a live performance promoter, nor aspired to be one—which is exactly the purpose made within the electronic mail DOJ quotes. DOJ’s declare is predicated on two incidents by which Dwell Nation and OVG have been discussing what to do when an OVG venue wished to guide an occasional present itself on a darkish evening. To painting that as an settlement to not compete in live performance promotion is farcical—notably when the grievance defines the related promotions market as a marketplace for regional or nationwide excursions and explicitly disavows the suggestion that ‘self-supply’ of exhibits from venue homeowners is a part of that market.

Regardless, OVG’s habits as a venue operator is absolutely according to each main enviornment and stadium within the nation—they should have an in-house booker who helps fill in any other case darkish nights, however they’ve no real interest in systematically taking up the danger of ensures that might be within the tens of millions of {dollars} for a present or tens of tens of millions of {dollars} for a tour.

DOJ additionally claims it was anticompetitive for Ticketmaster to compete for and win a ticketing contract OVG supplied. The idea is that the contract gave Ticketmaster an unfair benefit in securing the enterprise of impartial venues that have been managed by OVG as a result of it creates monetary incentives for OVG to ‘advocate for’ Ticketmaster. However there’s nothing remotely anticompetitive about that. Industrial preparations that contain incentive or advertising funds are widespread all through this business (and plenty of others). Venue administration corporations like OVG and ASM are able to advocate for quite a lot of service suppliers, together with however not restricted to ticketing corporations. So there’s competitors for the enterprise alternatives at each the venues they personal, which they management, and the venues they handle, which they don’t management however can doubtlessly affect. Ticketmaster competed and gained the contract on the deserves as a result of OVG decided it was the very best ticketing system obtainable.”

LEAVE A RESPONSE

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *